superg168 Secrets
superg168 Secrets
Blog Article
A close-by Tremendous-G WLAN working a 2Mbps video clip stream will probably not trigger significant interference to an 11g WLAN that’s also streaming a video.
It’s unlikely you’d be significantly bothered by a neighbor’s greatly utilized 802.11g WLAN when looking at a wirelessly streamed movie yourself.
Dynamic mode is intended for use in combined WLANs and can take into consideration the categories of stations (purchasers) in the WLAN as well as their bandwidth needs.
Since on the list of two WLANs experienced to move to check at various distances, and because I've only two notebooks, I utilized them both within the Super-G fifty percent of my examination rig to help make factors quick to maneuver all-around.
Tremendous-G vs. Broadcom 11g testing consisted of having the past situations and repeating them Together with the Atheros-dependent NETGEAR pair now set to Super-G manner.
A close-by Super-G WLAN jogging a 2Mbps movie stream will most likely not result in sizeable interference to an 11g WLAN that’s also streaming a video
This take a look at is meant to emulate the Broadcom Comdex demo (apart from that it makes use of two 802.11g WLANs) and establish the extent of interference over a video stream from a nearby WLAN that’s jogging as rapid as it may possibly go.
Figure 9 shows the throughput plot for the exam, which doesn’t seriously let you know A lot. The blip close to the close on the take a look at appears in many tests and is also a result of a periodic scan completed as Portion of Broadcom’s driver.
Because superg168 the bit level is restricted to 2Mbps, the spectrum generated isn’t pretty huge, which must Restrict the channel overlap, and thus the quantity of functionality degradation.
I’ll then present the effects of checks that I’ve operate in my home Workplace setting pitting not only Super-G from “typical” 11g wi-fi LANs, but in addition “regular” 11g WLANs in opposition to one another.
The timing gave the impression to be 45 seconds of Tremendous-G and fifteen seconds of 11g within the NETGEAR BETA dynamic Tremendous-G updates that I used. A different implementation of dynamic Tremendous-G in D-Connection Super-G enabled gear used by Broadcom in its testing showed the timing to be 120 seconds of Super-G and 75 seconds of 11g. So it seems like Atheros, NETGEAR, or both equally are doing some performance tuning.
And while it’s real that two 11g WLANs can interfere with one another as Atheros contends, it’s only when each are managing total-tilt, as well as then, the interference is gone by the point the WLANs are divided by 30 feet – perfectly wanting the 100 feet that Atheros continues to be quoted as stating would be the 11g interference zone.
The total implementation of Super-G has equally static and dynamic modes. Among the many differences are that static method equipment will only speak with other Tremendous-G units and channel bonding is always kicked in.
But before you go off wanting to know why Atheros would build “an 802.11g jammer” – to quotation one particular Broadcom advertising and marketing exec, in place of a completely new conventional in wi-fi LAN functionality, continue on on to Component 2 of this Need to have To grasp.